sharekasce.blogg.se

1. ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN FOR FREE
2. ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN .EXE
3. ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN 64 BIT
4. ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN UPGRADE

ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN UPGRADE

Also if you would have run the MS W7 upgrade adviser, you may have been notified that the program was not compatible. If you use the full names, perhaps it would help Easy Media Creator 9 (or EMC 9), EMC 10, Creator 2009, Creator 2010 might be less confusing. Roxio 9, if I remember was an OEM version so your post may have been moved because of that. like getting a great buy at Best Buy because a new version was coming out and the use of the names. You have gripes against Best Buy, Roxio, Adobe and your computer ! Perhaps some of them are of your own making. New software I need to use like Adobe PS is more complex, as the files keep getting larger.and more CPU power is needed.Įven authoring DVDs with EMC9 was a chore, as my system could not handle the large video files properly.

ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN 64 BIT

On the 64 bit issue, if you want to upgrade your system, I don't see any way around it.win7 is the future, I have a 6 year old winXP as you do, (expect MS to stop support soon) but this system (P4) is getting more difficult to use, as everything is now designed in the Net with heavy Video, audio and the CPU eating JAVA. So now, I find myself with a three generation old software that I've hardly used yet.and need to replace yet again! not a happy camper here. I then realized I was sold old software, and it was too late to exchanged it, all this happened because of this "Name Confusion" that Roxio created. When I first bought this Roxio EMC 9 Suite at Best Buy Roxio 10 was released less than a month after, and I had problems with Roxio rejecting my rebate as a previous user (EMC7?,).Ī few months later I came around here and found the title had changed to Roxio 9 and Roxio 10, I though EMC9 and Roxio9 were the same, but found my post sent to the "Legacy" area here after posting on the Roxio 9 section. This DOES work but is a bit of a bind to get a handful of games working when you have a beast of a PC, but then again, most games will play with only 4 cores, as gaming has not really evolved that far in development terms, they still program them to run OK with just a quad core processor.I just read around here a thread named "Name confusion" although I can't find it now. You really cannot expect a very old game to work with ALL modern PC's, there is a way of getting it to work, but involves forcing windows to start with only 4 cores! I've had many games in the past that refuse to support modern graphics cards, more than single core processors, etc.

ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN FOR FREE

Its like asking for a 16 bit game to work on a 64 bit processor, unless the developer does it for free (if they still exist!). Publishers cannot make games work with new hardware when the original developer no longer exists, also it costs time and money to get these games working again. There were reported patches that got the game working (in my experience the Origin version will never work even with these patches!)Įven the GOG game has a disclaimer that it will not work on a PC with more than 4 physical cores. GOG do offer the game, and it does seem to work with more than 4 cores/threads (even thought the GOG webpage says it will not!), so if Origin could offer the GOG version then it might solve the problems with those dissatisfied with a game that is about 10 years old! It sadly is not EA's fault either as they did not develop the game, they just distribute it! Pandemic Studios folded some years ago and there are no patches available to make the Origin version of the game work on modern processors with more than 4 cores/threads. The origin version of the game will NOT work with processors with more than 4 cores.

ARTCUT 2009 WONT RUN .EXE

exe to launch the game itself, it will refuse to load!